103 dignitaries condemn statements against SC verdict in Bhushan case
New Delhi, Aug 19 (IANS) After the Supreme Court held advocate Prashant Bhushan guilty of contempt for making derogatory remarks against the judiciary via two tweets, a group of 103 prominent citizens, including former High Court judges, retired senior police officers, retired IAS and IFS officers, and army officers have condemned the statements by pressure groups criticizing the apex court verdict.
The group criticized the statement issued by ‘Campaign for Judicial Accountability and Reforms’, (CJAR) on August 15, condemning the judgment and further calling upon the Supreme Court, and every judge, to reconsider their decision.
“The statements issued by the CJAR and a few other pressure groups condemning the judgment of the Supreme Court and criticising the process of judgment delivery are highly objectionable and unacceptable. We, the concerned citizens, unequivocally oppose such pseudo activism hidden in the garb of the civil society”, the statement reads. The apex court is yet to decide on the quantum of punishment, and the hearing on the sentence is scheduled on August 20.
The dignitaries said for a senior advocate of the Supreme Court, contempt of the court is something which cannot be justified by any pressure group. “The legal profession is a solemn and serious occupation, with constitutional, professional and ethical obligations. Any violation of the principles of professional ethics by an advocate is unfortunate and unacceptable”, read the statement.
The group said that this is not the first time Bhushan has objectionably criticized the courts without any basis or evidence. “This is also not the first occasion when he has made utterances which were inflammatory in nature. CJAR, counts, amongst its committee, Prashant Bhushan himself, apart from a few others, such as Arundhati Roy, etc., which shows that they are working on an agenda to plead their own cause extra –judicially”, said the statement.
The group cited Lord Denning, in the case of Morris Vs. Crown Office reported in (1970) 2 QB 114 corresponding to (1970) 2 WBLR 792, “The course of justice must not be deflected or interfered with. Those who strike at it strikes at the very foundations of our society.”
“We, the concerned citizens of the country, are deeply concerned by such statements by a group of persons who wrongly claim themselves to solely represent the civil society, and use every opportunity to strike at the roots of the Indian democratic institutions such as the Parliament, Election Commission of India, and now, the Supreme Court of India”, read the statement.
The signatories include: Justice K. R.Vyas, former Chief Justice Mumbai High Court, Amar Sinha, former Foreign Secretary, Sarvesh Kaushal, former Chief Secretary Punjab, among several others.
–IANS
ss/dpb/bg
